월간 보관물: 2015 1월

Sutras with the Commentary by Ramanuja 32   10. And Smriti texts say the same. Smriti texts also declare that he only who sits can meditate, ‘Having placed his steady seat upon a pure spot, there seated upon that seat, … 계속 읽기 →

Sutras with the Commentary by Ramanuja 31   27. But all the same he must be possessed of calmness, subjection of the senses, &c., since those are enjoined as auxiliaries to that, and must necessarily be accomplished. The question is … 계속 읽기 →

Sutras with the Commentary by Ramanuja 29   34. So much; on account of reflection. Only so much, i.e. only those qualities which have to be included in all meditations on Brahman, without which the essential special nature of Brahman … 계속 읽기 →

Sutras with the Commentary by Ramanuja 28   6. If it be said that there is difference on account of the text; we say no; on account of non-difference. So far it has been shown that the non-difference of injunction, … 계속 읽기 →

Sutras with the Commentary by Ramanuja 27   13. Some also (teach) thus. Moreover, the followers of one sakha explicitly teach that the connexion with one and the same body is for the individual soul a source of disadvantage, while … 계속 읽기 →

Sutras with the Commentary by Ramanuja 26   6. ‘On account of this not being stated by Scripture’; not so, on account of those who perform sacrifices and so on being understood. But, a further objection is raised, in the … 계속 읽기 →

Sutras with the Commentary by Ramanuja 25   But this cannot be urged against the theory of the individual soul being Brahman in so far as determined by real limiting adjuncts; for on that view we may explain the difference … 계속 읽기 →

Sutras with the Commentary by Ramanuja 24   19. For this very reason (the individual soul is) a knower. It has been shown that, different therein from Ether and the rest, the soul is not produced. This leads to the … 계속 읽기 →

Sutras with the Commentary by Ramanuja 23   37. And on account of the impossibility of rulership. Those who stand outside the Veda arrive through inference at the conclusion that the Lord is a mere operative cause. This being so, … 계속 읽기 →

Sutras with the Commentary by Ramanuja 22   16. And as it is not accepted, it is altogether disregarded. Kapila’s doctrine, although to be rejected on account of it’s being in conflict with Scripture and sound reasoning, yet recommends itself … 계속 읽기 →